Malaysia 101: Striving An Absolute Squatter-Free Policy

Squatters occupy an uninhabited building or unused land without the legal right to do so. Typically, squatters do not hold a title, pay rent, or have permission from the rightful owner to use the property. Squatters can sometimes be seen in a positive light, as they may bring unused land or property back into productive use, but they can also be viewed negatively, especially if their occupation interferes with the property rights of others. Image source: Philippine Star

Squatter State Policy

I was reading Malaysiakini’s report titled “Khalid urged to drop flawed policies” and it was interesting to note that the MB’s decision to carry on the ‘zero squatter policy’ draws more flak.

Council chairperson Ambiga Sreenevasan, in a two-page statement this evening, said the council was deeply concerned on Khalid’s remark that the latter will continue his predecessor Mohd Khir Toyo’s policy to eradicate all squatter settlements in the state.

I was surprised to hear Ambiga saying that the policy is flawed. It is not. The policy is not flawed but the execution certainly was.

Living in squatter settlements is often romanticized, but the reality is far from idyllic. These areas are typically characterized by a severe lack of basic amenities such as clean water, sanitation, and reliable electricity. Crime rates are often high, with residents facing daily challenges that stem from systemic disorganization and a lack of formal governance. The “zero squatter policy” aims to address these issues, but its implementation has been controversial.

It does not have to involve forceful eviction, which was a common approach during Khir Toyo’s administration. Instead, it can be executed with a focus on humane relocation and the provision of adequate housing, ensuring that the transition for residents is as smooth and fair as possible. This approach recognizes the complex socio-economic factors at play and seeks to find a balance between urban development and the rights of the affected communities.

Alternate Zero Squatter Policy

We can achieve a “zero squatter policy” in many other ways too such as:-

Redevelopment

The redevelopment of informal settlements, often referred to as squatter areas, is a critical urban development issue. A comprehensive approach to revamping these areas not only improves living conditions but also integrates the residents into the fabric of the city. By allowing residents to claim ownership of newly developed housing, cities can foster a sense of community and belonging.

This process involves careful planning and collaboration with the current inhabitants to ensure that their needs and rights are respected. The goal is to create sustainable, safe, and inclusive communities where former squatters can enjoy the benefits of formal housing without displacement, thus maintaining the social and cultural integrity of the area.

Eviction with Compensation

Eviction processes, when conducted with due diligence and respect for residents’ rights, can be managed in a way that minimizes conflict and resistance. It is essential to follow a proper legal procedure, ensuring that all actions are within the bounds of local laws and regulations. Adequate compensation should be offered, reflecting the value of the property as well as the potential inconvenience and relocation costs faced by the residents.

Furthermore, providing sufficient leeway in terms of time and support services can help residents transition smoothly to new accommodations. This approach not only facilitates a more amicable resolution but also upholds the dignity and rights of the individuals involved. By taking these measures, authorities and developers can foster a cooperative environment where residents feel their needs and concerns are genuinely considered and addressed.

Rezoning Squatter Areas

The rezoning initiative targets areas currently designated for squatters, aiming to transform these regions through comprehensive modernization efforts. This process will be undertaken collaboratively with the local residents, ensuring that their needs and insights are integral to the development plans. The objective is to enhance living conditions while respecting the community’s unique cultural and social fabric.

By integrating modern infrastructure and services, the plan seeks to uplift the entire area, providing a sustainable and improved quality of life for its inhabitants. This collaborative approach to urban development not only addresses the immediate need for better housing and facilities but also fosters a sense of ownership and pride among the residents, leading to a more cohesive and vibrant community.

Final Say

The implementation of a “zero squatter policy” can be seen as a proactive approach to urban planning and development. It underscores a commitment to ensuring that all residents have access to legitimate and safe housing, which in turn reflects on the government’s dedication to maintaining order and public welfare. Allowing informal settlements to proliferate unchecked can lead to a host of socioeconomic issues, including inadequate access to essential services and a lack of legal protection for residents.

Moreover, the challenge of squatters is indeed a global phenomenon, not unique to Malaysia. It requires a nuanced understanding of the underlying causes, such as economic disparities and rural-urban migration, and a comprehensive strategy that includes affordable housing, community development, and legal frameworks to address the needs of all citizens effectively. Thus, while the zero squatter policy’s intent is commendable, its execution must be handled with sensitivity and inclusivity to ensure that it does not inadvertently marginalize vulnerable populations.

It is prudent to reserve judgment on the zero squatter policy’s effectiveness until its implementation by the new State Government is observed. Premature criticism may not be constructive, especially without a comprehensive understanding of the forthcoming changes. The crux of the matter, however, lies in the State Government’s ability to formulate clear and equitable guidelines for the policy’s execution.

Historically plagued by corruption, overbearing enforcement, and inequity, the current administration must establish a transparent and fair framework. This will not only ensure accountability but also restore public trust in the government’s commitment to reform and justice. The success of this zero squatter policy will largely depend on the government’s transparency and its dedication to upholding ethical standards in its execution.

Read Also

Squatters – to be or not to be?

New house but same old broom